Monday, June 4, 2007

Colossians 1:1—the will of God

Παῦλος ἀπόστολος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ διὰ θελήματος θεοῦ καὶ Τιμόθεος ὁ ἀδελφὸς — Colossians 1:1

Paul often refers his apostleship to the will of God. To wit:
1 Corinthians 1:1 Παῦλος κλητὸς ἀπόστολος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ διὰ θελήματος θεοῦ καὶ Σωσθένης ὁ ἀδελφὸς
2 Corinthians 1:1 Παῦλος ἀπόστολος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ διὰ θελήματος θεοῦ καὶ Τιμόθεος ὁ ἀδελφὸς τῇ ἐκκλησίᾳ τοῦ θεοῦ τῇ οὔσῃ ἐν Κορίνθῳ σὺν τοῖς ἁγίοις πᾶσιν τοῖς οὖσιν ἐν ὅλῃ τῇ Ἀχαΐᾳ,
Ephesians 1:1 Παῦλος ἀπόστολος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ διὰ θελήματος θεοῦ τοῖς ἁγίοις τοῖς οὖσιν [ἐν Ἐφέσῳ] καὶ πιστοῖς ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ,
2 Timothy 1:1 Παῦλος ἀπόστολος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ διὰ θελήματος θεοῦ κατ᾽ ἐπαγγελίαν ζωῆς τῆς ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ
I may discuss this more fully if we get to v. 9, but it's my settled conviction that Scripture teaches only two aspects to the will of God, and not three.

By the range of expressions referring to God's will, Scripture only means God's sovereign will, which it is His responsibility to affect (i.e. Ephesians 1:11), or His revealed will, which it is our responsibility to fulfill (i.e. Romans 2:18). There is no third will of God referring to neither certainly decreed events, nor inerrantly and specially revealed directions, but to subjective, erring, and personal perceptions.

Having said that, I don't argue that it is always easy to tell which of the two is in mind.

In this case, however, while both elements are present, it is the former that is probably foremost in Paul's mind. Think of Galatians 1:1 — Παῦλος ἀπόστολος οὐκ ἀπ᾽ ἀνθρώπων οὐδὲ δι᾽ ἀνθρώπου ἀλλὰ διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ καὶ θεοῦ πατρὸς τοῦ ἐγείραντος αὐτὸν ἐκ νεκρῶν. Here, the stress is clearly on God's sovereign will and activity. Thus also the effectual call to be an apostle, in Romans 1:1's κλητὸς ἀπόστολος.

Now, necessarily, an apostle did receive direct and special revelation of God's will (cf. Galatians 1:11-12) . That was the nature of the office. But the phrase itself here probably means that God made Paul an apostle by sovereign appointment; the fact that it involved a special revelation is incidental to the phrase here, though essential to the office itself.

What the apostle clearly didn't mean was that, one day, in his quiet time with God, he felt a still, small voice, subtly urging him towards seeking apostleship. That isn't the way it happened. Paul didn't merely "feel moved" to be an apostle. God sovereignly willed Paul to be an apostle, so he was.

9 comments:

Dave Marriott said...

Dan, you are right on here. Paul makes that point even more clear in Galatians 1:15-16. His calling occured when it pleased God.

15 οτε δε ευδοκησεν ο θεος ο αφορισας με εκ κοιλιας μητρος μου και καλεσας δια της χαριτος αυτου 16 αποκαλυψαι τον υιον αυτου εν εμοι ινα ευαγγελιζωμαι αυτον εν τοις εθνεσιν ευθεως ου προσανεθεμην σαρκι και αιματι

His call to salvation and his call to apostleship happened at the same time...

clearly
http://seeingclearly.wordpress.com

Beth'sMomToo said...

Do you distinguish between θελημα and
βουλημα concerning the will of God? Or do you find they're used interchangeably?

DJP said...

They overlap, certainly; and I've seen authorities directly contradict each other on the distinction.

But it seems to me that the boul-group has a more set, determined, "counsel" feel to it, while the thel-group more indicates wishing, wanting, inclining towards, or even liking.

Steven Douglas said...

Dear DJP,

Sorry to be off-topic here, but I have seen all this wonderful Greek on a number of websites and my browser will not let me access to zhubert.com. Any perspectives?

Thank you.

Steve

Bryan C. McWhite said...

Boy, just when I get into your blog, you go belly up, Daniel! Any posts on the way? You okay?

Beth'sMomToo said...

Steven,

Did you try www.zhubert.com? I'm not a computer geek, but I can't understand why you wouldn't be able to access the site. It's a really useful one.

Mathaetaes said...

Beth'smomtoo,

Yup, wasn't working, but now it is. Don't know what the problem was. Thanks. It does look like a great resource.

Steve

Steven Craig Miller said...

You wrote: Thus also the effectual call to be an apostle, in Romans 1:1's κλητὸς ἀπόστολος.

It is interesting to note that in Paul's Greek Bible (namely, the LXX), the term κλητὸς means "guest." Thus the phrase κλητὸς ἀπόστολος could very well mean "guest apostle." Frankly, I find the traditional interpretation "called to be an apostle" to be suspect syntax.

ecornell said...

steven craig miller,
I am by no means a greek scholar, but would you apply this to verse 6,7?